-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
First steps to move to SQLDelight #47
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
libpretixsync/build.gradle
Outdated
packageName = "eu.pretix.libpretixsync.sqldelight" | ||
srcDirs('src/main/sqldelight/sqlite', 'src/main/sqldelight/common', 'src/main/sqldelight/migrations') | ||
|
||
version = 105 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm worried we'll forget to keep this in sync between build.gradle and build-postgres.gradle, can we move it to its own gradle file and import it from there?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm wondering if this is needed at all, since the version it deducts from the migration is prioritized anyway? I'll check if we can just remove it. If not, I agree that it should go into a common file
for (i in 0 until checkins.length()) { | ||
val ci = checkins.getJSONObject(i) | ||
val listid = ci.getLong("list") | ||
if (known.containsKey(listid)) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I see that it was the same in the old code, but reading this… this is wrong, isn't it? How did this ever work? We would need to use the server ID of the checkin here, not the list ID?
@robbi5 what do you think?
d7ede36
to
04b5936
Compare
d835bc1
to
58026f1
Compare
override fun getOptions(): List<QuestionOption>? = _options | ||
|
||
override fun requiresAnswer(): Boolean = required | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The implementation of getDependencyValues
is missing! This breaks dependencies between questions.
Here's a good event for testing:
https://staging.pretix.eu/control/event/postest/questions/questions/
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fixed in bd295fb.
Should we make getDependency()
and getDependencyValues()
abstract in QuestionLike
? Or are there many cases that rely on the defaults?
} | ||
|
||
override fun update(obj: BlockedTicketSecret, jsonobj: JSONObject) { | ||
// TODO: Test new behaviour. Original version had no update case |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There is a specialty about blocked secrets: We don't care about a BlockedTicketSecret with blocked=false. The only reason it exists on the API layer is to allow for differential sync during updates. But there is no need to store it. So instead of updating the blocked
field to 0, we can and should just delete the local database entry.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Correction, the old code does change the blocked field to false, but it never inserts a new row with blocked=false, and the new code does the same, so maybe this is correct this way.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We also have the clean-up call (db.blockedTicketSecretQueries.deleteNotBlocked()
) in download()
. That should clean up any rows that have been updated to blocked=false
.
The only thing I wonder is if we can simplify any of this to make it more maintainable (e.g. no special treatment in insert()
/update()
and just a clean-up in download()
maybe?). The performance impact of inserting / updating a few rows too many shouldn't be too significant (?)
if (autoPersist()) { | ||
insert(jsonobj) | ||
inserted += 1 | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Since we do no batching any more, autoPersist() does not make much sense any more. In fact, with autoPersist returning false, as e.g. the case for BlockedTicketSecretSyncAdapter, no data is saved any more!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Agree. Now that the implementations of insert
/update
contain the DB queries, there is no need to distinguish on BaseDownloadSyncAdapter
level. And with the current code it's very easy to make the mistake of defaulting to false like I did in the BlockedTicketSecretSyncAdapter
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done
41615cb
to
8b87835
Compare
import java.util.Date | ||
import java.util.TimeZone | ||
|
||
class AndroidUtilDateAdapter : ColumnAdapter<Date, String> { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can this adapter be used by JVM as well or is it really android specific?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's specific to how requery saved Date
values as strings to the DB on Android. While we get 2024-11-13T09:49:28Z
there, it uses a different format on a plain JVM (2024-11-13 09:49:28.210
).
In theory, you can use this adapter in other places. But you probably want the JavaUtilDateAdapter
for backwards compatibility on the JVM.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We found a bug in there actually. You might want to check out a566d2d
It returns the result of apiCall, which is non-null.
Since we no longer inherit from classes like AbstractReceipt, the JSON utils must be added separately.
Removes the positionid of the add-on parent from the JSON and replaces it with just the addon_to ID. With SQLDelight, we can no longer directly resolve the relation with just the addon_to field, which means that we have to pass in either the ReceiptLine that addon_to points to or its positionid. Since the toJSON() is mostly used for logging purposes and the positionid is not strictly required, we can simplify the function here and add the equivalent of addon_to.positionid to the JSON afterwards in the caller where required.
Provide the same functionality as the getters on AbstractItem, but for the SQLDelight query result.
Question models were missing the getDependencyValues() override.
We were providing the wrong type of Instant.
Some query building code remains which should be migrated in a separate step.
SQLDelight returns the Long value directly on Postgres while it wraps it in a result type on SQLDelight.
…droid is too old for TRUE/FALSE (PRETIXPOS-1HH)
Since SimpleDateFormat is not thread safe, we might be running into race conditions here actually. Re-creating a new instance is expensive, so this is only a temporary fix while we validate a change to DateTimeFormatter.
Should guarantee thread safety without constantly re-creating formatters.
Reduces warnings when we convert them to models.
The change in cce5bf9 fixed booleans on older SQLite versions, but broke the queries for Postgres. This is a workaround that should make both databases happy. Since Postgres is extra pedantic in CASE epxressions, the complex order position queries had to be moved to the set of dialect-specific queries.
Updates with 1 instead of TRUE also don't work on Postgres.
No description provided.